<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Freakonomics Blog - PR Machine Interview</title>
	<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/19/freakonomics-prmachine-interview/</link>
	<description>September 19-23, 2005 :: Public Relations and Business Communications in the Age of Blogs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Mudge&#8217;s Technology and Government Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/19/freakonomics-prmachine-interview/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Mudge&#8217;s Technology and Government Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 04:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/19/freakonomics-prmachine-interview/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>[...] Stephen J. Dubner:  Blogs being so popular has to do with the advances in technology and the fact that most of them are free to develop. They aren't one-way communications vehicles. They are about building two-way relationships. They are the perfect form of true interactive communications vs. email or a website.   People blog about issues that are not addressed well in the media. Bloggers are filling in the cracks. They are illuminating information that was previously overlooked. Bloggers fill in the cracks and are adding value to what can be a puzzle reporters are piecing together. I know many journalists, who although initially critical of blogs, have now come to truly rely on them and endorse them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Stephen J. Dubner:  Blogs being so popular has to do with the advances in technology and the fact that most of them are free to develop. They aren&#8217;t one-way communications vehicles. They are about building two-way relationships. They are the perfect form of true interactive communications vs. email or a website.   People blog about issues that are not addressed well in the media. Bloggers are filling in the cracks. They are illuminating information that was previously overlooked. Bloggers fill in the cracks and are adding value to what can be a puzzle reporters are piecing together. I know many journalists, who although initially critical of blogs, have now come to truly rely on them and endorse them. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/19/freakonomics-prmachine-interview/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/19/freakonomics-prmachine-interview/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Part of Godin's premise is that people don't have the time or "bandwidth" to deal with raw data.... Actually, part of the premise is that people don't even want to *believe* data when presented with it. They want stories about how certain wine glass shapes make the wine taste better (even though it's empirically untrue).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of Godin&#8217;s premise is that people don&#8217;t have the time or &#8220;bandwidth&#8221; to deal with raw data&#8230;. Actually, part of the premise is that people don&#8217;t even want to *believe* data when presented with it. They want stories about how certain wine glass shapes make the wine taste better (even though it&#8217;s empirically untrue).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
