Consumer Generated: from Mayhem to Marketing
Posted by Administrator on September 21st, 2005
Why WOM is back on marketers’ agenda and how to make it work for their brands.
By Joel Cere, Netcoms – Hill & Knowlton | Beyond PR
EDITORS’ CHOICE | Customer Generated Marketing
A 2004 Intelliseek study
CGM is born out of consumer empowerment, frustration and a long memory.
First, consumers talk to each other more because they can. Self-publishing tools and enhanced/user-friendly communication technologies have made consumer generated content increasingly popular. Jonathan Miller
Second, the trust bond between businesses and consumers is fading and consumer-to-consumer relations have become a viable alternative. There is a growing disconnect between marketing hype and customer experience, and the conversations made possible by technology makes it more apparent. Consumers try to engage with corporations on this issue but the latter have been deafened by decades of shouting advertising slogans in guise of dialogue. As a result, consumers rely on each other more for product education and information. In fact, word-of-mouth is valued 1.5 times more by consumers
Third, the Internet has a long memory (“the e-lephant never forgets�). 81% of consumers aged 30 to 64 years old use the web to research products or services
Taking these three factors into consideration, it is obvious that a fundamental change in our relationship with brands and the way we are marketed to is under way. As the authors of the Clue Train manifesto
This new balance of power, where consumers own marketing is aptly named “Consumer Generated Marketing�. A term derived from Pete Blackshaw’s “Consumer Generated Media�. It spurns from consumers desire to tap into collective experience to balance perceived biased information received from entities with vested interest in their purchase. Consumers now have the tools and the will to promote companies who fulfil their promises, and to destroy those who break them. This has an impact on both consumers and companies’ behaviours and set high expectations for their relationships.
The automotive industry is a good example of a category rocked by CGM. Nowadays, very few consumers would purchase a car without first checking online opinions or comments by other car owners. Nearly 150 million searches are conducted every year on the term “new car” alone
Several high profiles marketing or PR setbacks, such as the recent Dell or Land Rover cases also involved consumers upset by the performance of a product and the companies’ response (or lack of) to their grief. These consumer originated campaigns led to product replacement or compensation and widespread public vindication. More importantly, it forced the affected companies, and those who watched the saga unfolding to pay more attention to how they fulfil their promise to their existing clients instead of focussing solely on acquiring new ones. Fred Reichheld
Companies do not always need to be at the receiving end of a consumer generated mayhem campaign. Provided that their willingness to listen transpires throughout the entire organisation, marketers can leverage consumers’ goodwill and networks to their advantage.
7 steps to turn a “no logo� into a �yes logo� conversation
Trying to forcefully implant marketing messages onto conversations is disruptive and does not work
1. Reclaim the call centre
Monitoring the blogosphere, newsgroups and consumer rating sites for consumer feedback is a prerequisite. But I would argue that marketers are missing another trick: to reclaim call centres. There is a vast amount of customer interaction there, but too little information is fed back to the organisation. Gathering better knowledge on consumer issues and training/empowering staff to deal with them would certainly help deliver a better consumer experience. Most disaster stories include an element of customer representative failure, be it on the phone or online. This is often the first channel a dissatisfied consumer will turn to, before venting his/her anger online.
2. Fix what is broken
Jim Heskett
3. Be prepared to join the conversation
Marketers should familiarise themselves with blogging dynamics and newsgroups etiquette. Several companies have successfully established company blogging policies and have equipped their staff with expertise in dealing with bloggers. The decision to blog or not needs careful planning but you need to gather some experience about it sooner than later if you want to remain in touch with your increasingly tech savvy and networked consumer base.
4. Treat influencers like VIPs
Nowadays, you have to pitch to bloggers too. Find out who the influencers in your sector are and treat them like VIPs: exclusive previews, product testing, consultation on marketing plan, customer services audit, etc… This is what companies like Microsoft (with their developers network) or Alfa Romeo (who is running a successful online community leaders program) have been doing for years.
5. Tailor your marketing for consumer-to-consumer distribution
Advertisers seem to have discovered WOM’s effectiveness with Burger King’s Subservient Chicken viral campaign. A few months ago, Microsoft launched a campaign to recruit bloggers to promote Longhorn. Vespa has recently launched a blog to provide “tips on the latest tools to get around cities more quickly and enjoyably� while Ubisoft encourages girls into gaming via the Frag Dolls blog. Technology company Marqui even pays bloggers to mention their products. This is a different world and it needs different rules and different formats. Rehashing your ad campaign or your PR ideas will not work. You need to think about it differently, from start. Talk to the experts.
6. Create a platform for consumers to express themselves
If you want to create a blog, allow readers to comment and do not censor or remove their postings just because you don’t like what they have to say. It takes courage to listen but consumers take notice as David Gee from HP found out. Ultimately, you need to contribute positive buzz online, both in quality and volume. That means encouraging consumers to say good things about your products or direct them to where they can. Gap launched the “How Do You Wear It?� campaign to invite people to upload pictures of themselves fully Gap clothed. Mercedes Benz goes one step further and invites customers to co-create its advertising campaigns. Often, the conversations are spontaneous: a lot of positive brand messages are posted every day at the iPod Lounge while NikeTalk, the “non-affiliated online sneakers community� received 200 million visits.
7. Let consumers be your marketers
Consumers know best what make them tick and how to spread their enthusiasm to their friends. “Network marketing� companies, from Avon to Tupperware have been turning consumers into ambassadors for decades. I will not be surprised if companies look into their experience to help shape their CGM strategy. The local gym club offering gifts for any friends you convince to buy a membership is using a similar technique of capitalising on consumer’s connections and marketing skills (and you would not recommend it to your friends if you did not enjoy the experience).
Technology now allows corporations to bring these relational techniques to a mass audience. Regus, the office rental company is using social network Ecademy to market its small business offer. Procter & Gamble runs Connect + Develop, a program aimed at generating new product ideas from consumers and external experts. It is credited for several successful product innovations
Some companies have pushed customer involvement further by allowing customers’ reactions to a marketing campaign to shape its direction. My favourite example is Sega’s ESPN NFL Football campaign were rumours of an X-file style conspiracy to cover-up violent side effects generated by playing a video-game were orchestrated by advertising agency Wieden + Kennedy and thousands of consumers. The campaign integrated TV spots, blogs, newsgroups, fake lawyers letters, viral videos, product sampling, newspaper classifieds, etc… in a real immersive and consumer driven brand experience. Sega sales exceeded expectations by 20%.
WOM has always been the driving force of businesses yet as a marketing discipline, it is still in its infancy. How will technology, consumers and businesses shape its development and what will be the consequences for old school advertising and public relations is still up for debate. What is certain is that the fundamentals underpinning its renaissance guarantee that consumer feedback and recommendations will be increasingly important and influential in guaranteeing a marketing campaign’s success. After decades of being told that the consumer is King, I finally feel like one.

About the author
Joel Cere heads Hill & Knowlton’s online communication practice (Netcoms) for Europe, Middle East and Africa and manage several global marketing initiatives for the firm. He has expertise in e-marketing, communication, trans-national account management and strategic planning. Prior to join Hill & Knowlton, Joel worked for Grey Interactive UK as Strategy/Practice Director for financial, healthcare and consumer good clients and consulted on international projects in Paris and Singapore where he ran his own agency. He has been a guest lecturer at the University of Metz, France since 1999 and is currently studying for a MBA at the London Business School. Joel is a member of the Singapore UK Association and of the Marketing Society.
September 22nd, 2005 at 3:54 pm
[…] Global PR Blog: A 2004 Intelliseek study 1 (PDF) found that consumer–to-consumer recommendations—even online consumer postings to forums—carry a higher trust factor than virtually all other forms of advertising, including TV, radio and print. That did not come as a surprise to many long established businesses. In fact, one of them always understood the value of consumer recommendations; its entire sales strategy relies on turning customers into brand ambassadors and capitalising on their social networks to influence others to purchase. […]
October 5th, 2005 at 3:01 am
Recently, Mathew Creamer, a writer at AD AGE, wrote an article titled, ‘Is Buzz Marketing Illegal?’ Wow, want to fan the flames? As you read this a number of WOM providers are preparing a response to the title and the body of content associated with the article.
To be honest, I like advertising as a medium. Sometimes as great commerce, sometimes as great art. On occasion, a balance of both. A few (only a few) ad guys I like and respect. Some I know (Mark Pearson), others I don’t (Donny Deutsch). Both, because they are who they are. Period. They infuse their passion, direction and genius into what they deliver. They aren’t afraid of mistakes nor do they shun from risk or innovation. Bravo guys.
Back to WOM. Recently, at a WOM conference, I had conversation with a fellow marketer in which I painted a picture of a Senator calling for hearings into the need to regulate our industry due to the need to protect the consumer from…well, you get the picture. Truth is, both myself and the other marketer see this as a reality given Washington’s shameless need for grandstanding and the belief that paid WOM marketers are hiding in the crowd, posing as you and me, waiting to pounce on unsuspecting citizens and empty their wallet and brainwash them.
In the world of WOM, we can (and should) take lessons from the early days in technology. I speak from experience, as I directly participated in this world, running a tech firm and participating in the hype that spread from Northern Highway 101 (Palo Alto/Burlingame/The Valley) to Silicon Alley (New York) and all ends in between. Spam is tech’s red-headed step-child. We didn’t set rules or pay attention to what could happen if things got worse, and they did. We didn’t pay attention to the communication vehicles, only the apps. Shame on us and lesson learned.
Tech’s got spam. The ad world has advertorials and direct mail. WOM has shilling. So what’s shilling? Read the AD AGE article. Paid or incentivized endorsement done undercover. There is a BIG grey area here in terms of what is paid or incentivized endorsement. Points? Rewards? Cash? Also, how ‘under-cover’?
To better understand the impact of this, you have to know that Word of Mouth is really broken into two distinct categories-Buzz and Advocacy. Buzz can follow Advocacy, but visa-versa is tough. Advocates move the needle-long term. It generates marketshare and profit. Advocates are sustainable; they deliver results, consume more, communicate more, recommend more, and are more passionate, knowledgeable and loyal. They don’t like to be ‘overtly’ paid. They won’t endorse hot dogs one week and cell-phones the next. Buzz is quick and a little thin on meaningful content…or trust. That is unless, it has some degree of advocacy intermixed or on the back-end.
As much as I want to say that the AD AGE article is full of hot air and an advertising industry conspiracy to discredit WOM marketers, I can’t. Why? In large part, the article is valid.
With that said, from my vantage point, few ad agencies I am aware of are capable of matching the focus, efforts and results of WOM-centric firms such as ComBlu, Intelliseek, GfK (and a dozen or so others), etc. We are specialists, not generalists. We don’t create brands, we make them better. The one exception to this is Organic. They are great. They get it.
What we (WOM specialists) do is based on discipline, measurement and lots and lots of expertise in very specific areas center around research, psychology, sociology, public relations and to some degree, database marketing.
So in conclusion, remember that WOM can be a double-edged sword. There is NO magic bullet. Be careful. Don’t take anything for granted and if you are paying a spokesperson, call it what it is, no matter if it is on TV or grass-roots. It’s only a matter of degree. We need to learn from history. Spam and the excess of advertising have taught smart marketers a lot. We need to heed and adhere to these lessons if we are to be more effective and also respected.