<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR, Blogging, and the New PR Meme</title>
	<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/</link>
	<description>September 19-23, 2005 :: Public Relations and Business Communications in the Age of Blogs</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>David Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>So, it seem, it is time for PR to reach for the sky and learn about the wider area of interest beyond agentry. Agentry still has a place and can be useful when looking for blog flack to add content. Not a good idea but will it will happen in the blogsphere but the technology and activist threaten. Just today the news is a warning for armature who attempts to just jump in.  Mobile communication got and new toy this week. Evidence suggests that beaming TV to &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/23/oxford_trial/" rel="nofollow"&gt;mobile devices&lt;/a&gt; can be a mass market service. Meantime, experts have found a Trojan horse worm which can &lt;a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26398" rel="nofollow"&gt;jump&lt;/a&gt; from a mobile phone to a PC. If that was not enough, a new &lt;a href="http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2005/s1467389.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;handbook&lt;/a&gt; is showing bloggers and cyber dissidents around the world how to circumvent censorship and disclosure laws. Online PR just became even more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it seem, it is time for PR to reach for the sky and learn about the wider area of interest beyond agentry. Agentry still has a place and can be useful when looking for blog flack to add content. Not a good idea but will it will happen in the blogsphere but the technology and activist threaten. Just today the news is a warning for armature who attempts to just jump in.  Mobile communication got and new toy this week. Evidence suggests that beaming TV to <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/23/oxford_trial/" rel="nofollow">mobile devices</a> can be a mass market service. Meantime, experts have found a Trojan horse worm which can <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26398" rel="nofollow">jump</a> from a mobile phone to a PC. If that was not enough, a new <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2005/s1467389.htm" rel="nofollow">handbook</a> is showing bloggers and cyber dissidents around the world how to circumvent censorship and disclosure laws. Online PR just became even more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Heck yeah...weren't the jetsons supposed to be living in 2010?  We've got a long way to go before the joys of robot housmaids and a car that folds into a briefcase.  

It seems to me, that the more things change, the more they stay the same.  The advances in technology only add to the toolbox that we have to enhance the fundamentals of good PR.  Like you said about product placing; I remember reading something taht said companies paid millions of dollars to have their products placed on an episode of "Friends".  In the future, instead of T.V. shows it maybe Podcasts, but the principle is still the same.

I didn't even know about vlogs until you mentioned them.  That is an interesting...and very logical concept (as the next step from blogs).  I'm guessing that companies could put ads and news conferences on their vlogs for people to view and give feedback on.  LIke I said, this stuff is ever evolving and changing...it's tough to keep up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck yeah&#8230;weren&#8217;t the jetsons supposed to be living in 2010?  We&#8217;ve got a long way to go before the joys of robot housmaids and a car that folds into a briefcase.  </p>
<p>It seems to me, that the more things change, the more they stay the same.  The advances in technology only add to the toolbox that we have to enhance the fundamentals of good PR.  Like you said about product placing; I remember reading something taht said companies paid millions of dollars to have their products placed on an episode of &#8220;Friends&#8221;.  In the future, instead of T.V. shows it maybe Podcasts, but the principle is still the same.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t even know about vlogs until you mentioned them.  That is an interesting&#8230;and very logical concept (as the next step from blogs).  I&#8217;m guessing that companies could put ads and news conferences on their vlogs for people to view and give feedback on.  LIke I said, this stuff is ever evolving and changing&#8230;it&#8217;s tough to keep up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sab</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Sab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I think one should distinguish between blog consultancies and blog consultants with an agency/consultany. The first will promise a lot with a blog and the latter, as Erin pointed out, is part of a whole that seeks the best solution for a customer. And if blogs are not part of a solution for a certain customer then the blog consultant in the team can take a cigarette break. Or have more areas of expertise to begin with :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one should distinguish between blog consultancies and blog consultants with an agency/consultany. The first will promise a lot with a blog and the latter, as Erin pointed out, is part of a whole that seeks the best solution for a customer. And if blogs are not part of a solution for a certain customer then the blog consultant in the team can take a cigarette break. Or have more areas of expertise to begin with <img src='http://www.globalprblogweek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pepper</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Ok, Justin, that's the hard question but my guesses are that the next thing in PR and technology are pitching podcasts and product placement / sponsorship in vlogs. But, in reality that is just another extension of consumer generated media. 

The next great thing is always hard to peg - who would have thought that blogging would take off to the extent that it has? Blogs are beginning to have influence with the mainstream, general public, which is helping their growth. 

I'm still hoping that the inventions on the Jetsons finally arrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, Justin, that&#8217;s the hard question but my guesses are that the next thing in PR and technology are pitching podcasts and product placement / sponsorship in vlogs. But, in reality that is just another extension of consumer generated media. </p>
<p>The next great thing is always hard to peg - who would have thought that blogging would take off to the extent that it has? Blogs are beginning to have influence with the mainstream, general public, which is helping their growth. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still hoping that the inventions on the Jetsons finally arrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>I'm sure Robert would be sitting there shaking his head at my first post.

Erin's analogy hit the nail on the head (sorry couldn't resist) as to what a blog should be, one of many tools that we have to assist us to get our message out. 

So, what do you see as the next new tool coming down the pipe.  I've learned that all of this stuff moves pretty quick, so I think I'd like to get a jump on the next big thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Robert would be sitting there shaking his head at my first post.</p>
<p>Erin&#8217;s analogy hit the nail on the head (sorry couldn&#8217;t resist) as to what a blog should be, one of many tools that we have to assist us to get our message out. </p>
<p>So, what do you see as the next new tool coming down the pipe.  I&#8217;ve learned that all of this stuff moves pretty quick, so I think I&#8217;d like to get a jump on the next big thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Jeremy,
Haha ... oh, I got your sarcasm!  And I think it also can apply to the naive assumptions of those non-PR folks that try to lecture PR professionals and even go as far as to declare PR dead.  So yes, good subhead -- succintly conveys the absurdity of the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,<br />
Haha &#8230; oh, I got your sarcasm!  And I think it also can apply to the naive assumptions of those non-PR folks that try to lecture PR professionals and even go as far as to declare PR dead.  So yes, good subhead &#8212; succintly conveys the absurdity of the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pepper</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Erin, the hammer/toolbox analogy is great. Bad PR will always be around, because the barrier to entry is just a telephone and a computer (well, that's the perceived barrier to entry). That was the reason for my sarcastic subhed: anyone can do PR, didn't you know that??

Good PR looks at everything available, sees which tools fit best, and then moves forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erin, the hammer/toolbox analogy is great. Bad PR will always be around, because the barrier to entry is just a telephone and a computer (well, that&#8217;s the perceived barrier to entry). That was the reason for my sarcastic subhed: anyone can do PR, didn&#8217;t you know that??</p>
<p>Good PR looks at everything available, sees which tools fit best, and then moves forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pepper</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 05:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Nah, Justin - I'll just blame Robert ;)

I am not sure if there is a fear of blogs themselves, but there is always a fear of the unknown or the uncontrollable. That's just human nature. 

I'm part of the camp that views blogs as another tool in PR. They are great tools, but should not be a replacement for traditional outreach, but a complementary tool. But, it is too early in blogging to see where it will all eventually fall out. I have seen blogs that have been launched for companies that are great implementations, and other blogs that just seem like the PR team had no clue what to do, and thought "let's launch a blog" - and it does nothing for the brand.

Yes, blogs are important, but it's just as important to be smart about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, Justin - I&#8217;ll just blame Robert <img src='http://www.globalprblogweek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I am not sure if there is a fear of blogs themselves, but there is always a fear of the unknown or the uncontrollable. That&#8217;s just human nature. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m part of the camp that views blogs as another tool in PR. They are great tools, but should not be a replacement for traditional outreach, but a complementary tool. But, it is too early in blogging to see where it will all eventually fall out. I have seen blogs that have been launched for companies that are great implementations, and other blogs that just seem like the PR team had no clue what to do, and thought &#8220;let&#8217;s launch a blog&#8221; - and it does nothing for the brand.</p>
<p>Yes, blogs are important, but it&#8217;s just as important to be smart about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 05:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Allow me to make a addendum to my last post.  After reading more in-depthly several of the articles in Jeremy's initial post, I understand the idea of PR being dead, in the sense of writing press realeases and such.  To me, while I know this is an integral part of PR and many people make their living doing this, I never really considered it to be PR alone.  For a company to use its PR department to do nothing but press releases, is not profitable and IMHO not at all what PR people need to be spending their talents doing.  I hope this form of PR is dead, so that PR can grow and be recognized more and more as an integral part of any successful business.

While attending a PRSA conference last year in Birmingham, AL one of the professionals in the room asked the keynote speaker about blogs.  The speaker replied with, "Who here has a blog".  Only the students in the room raised their hands.  The look of surprise and confusion on the faces of the professionals was amusing.  Most of them in the room, didn't understand blogs at that time and in a sense, I think they were scared of the changes that the blog and the blogesphere could have on their world.  This is what I was referring to in my previous post when I was talking about "fear".  Sorry for confussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to make a addendum to my last post.  After reading more in-depthly several of the articles in Jeremy&#8217;s initial post, I understand the idea of PR being dead, in the sense of writing press realeases and such.  To me, while I know this is an integral part of PR and many people make their living doing this, I never really considered it to be PR alone.  For a company to use its PR department to do nothing but press releases, is not profitable and IMHO not at all what PR people need to be spending their talents doing.  I hope this form of PR is dead, so that PR can grow and be recognized more and more as an integral part of any successful business.</p>
<p>While attending a PRSA conference last year in Birmingham, AL one of the professionals in the room asked the keynote speaker about blogs.  The speaker replied with, &#8220;Who here has a blog&#8221;.  Only the students in the room raised their hands.  The look of surprise and confusion on the faces of the professionals was amusing.  Most of them in the room, didn&#8217;t understand blogs at that time and in a sense, I think they were scared of the changes that the blog and the blogesphere could have on their world.  This is what I was referring to in my previous post when I was talking about &#8220;fear&#8221;.  Sorry for confussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/21/pepper-pr-blogging-newpr-meme/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Talk about being buried alive!

No, PR is not dead.  If anything, bad PR is dead -- "bad PR" meaning the practice of bad PR.  What I think this "PR is Dead" movement has done is to draw a line in the sand.  Separate the strong from the weak -- essentially, those that will evolve and embrace this new communication tool from those who will continue with what they were probably doing anyway (not much).

And you know, bad PR isn't even dead.  It will continue for a while, but it will become less and less acceptable as clients expect more and more from their public relations programs.

Now, smart PR definitely is not dead.  Never will be.  There's just too many things a well-rounded PR strategy created by a savvy PR professional has to offer that a blog could never even hope to accomplish.  (Like reaching local and regional target publics, as you mentioned, Jeremy.)

Blogs are important, just as all other communications tools are important and need to be understood by PR professionals.  But they're a far cry from the one and only NEW PR.  Basically, blogs are like a hammer:  a really handy tool, but not the whole toolbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about being buried alive!</p>
<p>No, PR is not dead.  If anything, bad PR is dead &#8212; &#8220;bad PR&#8221; meaning the practice of bad PR.  What I think this &#8220;PR is Dead&#8221; movement has done is to draw a line in the sand.  Separate the strong from the weak &#8212; essentially, those that will evolve and embrace this new communication tool from those who will continue with what they were probably doing anyway (not much).</p>
<p>And you know, bad PR isn&#8217;t even dead.  It will continue for a while, but it will become less and less acceptable as clients expect more and more from their public relations programs.</p>
<p>Now, smart PR definitely is not dead.  Never will be.  There&#8217;s just too many things a well-rounded PR strategy created by a savvy PR professional has to offer that a blog could never even hope to accomplish.  (Like reaching local and regional target publics, as you mentioned, Jeremy.)</p>
<p>Blogs are important, just as all other communications tools are important and need to be understood by PR professionals.  But they&#8217;re a far cry from the one and only NEW PR.  Basically, blogs are like a hammer:  a really handy tool, but not the whole toolbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
