Why I Take the Time to Blog
Posted by Administrator on September 23rd, 2005
By Peter Himler, Flatiron Communications, LLC | The Flack
EDITORS’ CHOICE | The Practice of PR Blogging
First the name: In deciding on “The Flack,â€? I looked at other weblogs, including those under Nick Denton’s Gawker brand, and concluded that I needed something edgy and irreverent. The Flack certainly met these criteria. More importantly, this is what many journalists call PR pros, even those at the top of our profession. If the blogosphere is a sphere of transparency, why deny the reality? Do I like the label? No. Can it be used to make a point? Hopefully.
There are days when I just can’t seem to find the time (nor motivation) to scour my RSS reader for stories that meet the self-imposed criteria for posting on The Flack. Yet, amidst client work, business development, and my daily media consumption, let alone my family, I manage to squeeze out one or two and occasionally three items a day. This summer, I even spent an hour posting from a McDonalds on the Cape, which had the only wireless hotspot in town.
To what end?
It certainly isn’t for the money. I had considered registering for Google’s AdSense, but soon became daunted by all the personal information the monopolistic money machine had requested of me. Anyway, the number of my daily readers probably wouldn’t generate much in the way of cash flow. Even gawker.com founder Nick Denton lamented how blogging remains a small business. This remains true in spite of the fact that four of his weblogs reside in the top-ten most-visited, according to a recent study (PDF) from ComScore. I wonder how Jason Calacanis’s Weblogs Inc. and John Battelle’s new publishing venture Federated Media are faring in the monetization department?
Perhaps my motivation to post is derived through some hidden desire to strike back at the countless editorial gatekeepers who over the years rudely hung up the phone on me or failed to see the intrinsic news in a story idea I was presenting. After all, if Mark Cuban could use his blog as a bully pulpit to expose the shortcomings of the fifth estate, why couldn’t I? Too bad Cuban’s Blog Maverick ranks in the top 25 of most-visited, while mine languishes near the bottom of the 16.3 million blogs currently being tracked by Technorati and others. But that’s not the point.
Even with a few readers, the viral nature of the blogosphere allows one’s voice to be heard and even amplified. I was surprised to receive a call one day from an enterprising PR Week reporter who noticed an item I had run on a typical PR quagmire. He decided to write a story using me as an expert source. Or the e-mail I received from an old colleague pitching me a story about one of her clients. It was a fun, PR-related piece and I posted an item on it. My old colleague sent it to her client as a press clipping.
Are these sufficient reasons for me to take 20-30 minutes per posting on a daily basis?
Can The Flack serve as a magnet for new clients or a positive contributor to my personal and professional brand identity? Thus far, I’ve seen no evidence of this. I will say, however, that my Google profile has changed considerably since starting the blog. I’m not sure this is such a good thing. Previously, my profile consisted mainly of the various speeches, interviews and client projects with which I’ve been involved over a long career in the PR industry. As I continue to post, those “career highlights� have slipped deeper and deeper into the recesses of Google’s results rankings.
Many create blogs to espouse a point of view or advocate for a specific cause. I have learned that this can be a doubled-edged sword in a service industry. Sure, one achieves a modicum of satisfaction by pontificating in the public domain. Perhaps others will even agree with the commentary and link to it, elevating the blog in the search engine rankings. Occasionally, one’s musings could catalyze change or a consumer movement, as was the case with the recent tirade by BuzzMachine’s Jeff Jarvis over his issues with Dell Computer’s customer service.
Still, there is great danger in being too opinionated. What you post lives forever on the Internet. If you are looking to land a new client, it is important to know that whatever you’ve written about the client’s products or services is easily discoverable…for better or worse. I also remember what Microsoft’s evangelical blogger Robert Scoble had to say at a NYC conference about the dos and don’ts of blogging. He made the point that one shouldn’t blog if he or she is going through some personal crisis at home. (I believe he had himself gone through a divorce.) Your daily mood tends to manifest in your postings. Most importantly, your words become an open and indelible book.
As I look at other “PR blogs,� I am always impressed by their sophisticated musings on the digital revolution’s impact on our profession, which you hopefully will come to understand by navigating this PR wiki. They continue to devote a tremendous amount of space to the new, important and industry-changing digital content management tools and trends now and soon available to us.
Who’d have thought that one could instantly gauge consumer awareness and perception of one’s product, service, issue, personality, etc., by navigating a site like Technorati, Alexa or Intelliseek’s Blog Pulse? Or that the blogging community, and specifically its most linked-to denizens, have the capacity to not only influence the national news agenda, but force real change. (Just ask Dan Rather.) The blogosphere is simply the largest focus group and/or living laboratory the world had ever known. It also has irrevocably changed the top-down nature of news dissemination – something PR pros must take the time to learn about…or perish.
I believe that the long-held tenets of the PR profession (as well as its less-than-savory aspects) require greater transparency, to ensure the future vitality of the industry.
I thus see my fledgling blog as a micro media channel that aspires to shed light on the enigmatic, but still growing practice of public relations. Admittedly, the profession continues to be criticized and misunderstood by most. The choice for my blog’s title – The Flack – sums up how many still perceive practitioners. Hence, unlike many of my fellow PR bloggers, I try not to obsess about the revolution at our doorstep (though I may soon experiment with v-logging and podcasting). I prefer to opine on the tactical and ethical underpinnings of public relations and how it permeates the news and information we consume daily.
A few months ago, the living legends of our industry gathered at the behest of Jack O’Dwyer, a long-time chronicler of the practice of PR. It included Harold Burson, Daniel Edelman, Al Golin, Margery Kraus and David Finn. (Howard Rubenstein had a conflict.) Excluding APCO’s Ms. Kraus, the average age of these still-practicing PR icons topped 80! Who will inherit, advocate for, and represent the richness and contributions of our profession as it undergoes change? Lizzie, Peggy, Leslee and Ron? I couldn’t think of a greater motivation for posting every day.

About the author
Peter Himler is an independent public relations and media consultant who is the principal of a new enterprise in New York City called Flatiron Communications, LLC. Peter has a long career as a senior media strategist on the agency side of the industry, including 20 years in the WPP family of companies. He was named PR News’s 2004 PR Professional/Media Relations Executive of the Year, and the PR program he led to build the World War II Memorial was awarded PR Week’s “Public Sector Campaign of the Year.� He serves as president of the Publicity Club of New York, is active with the Center for Communication, the Museum of TV & Radio and United Way of New York City, and sits on the Boards of Advisors of the Communication and Media Studies Program at Tufts University, from which he holds a B.A. degree in Political Science and French.
{tags: prblogweek, pr, public+relations, pr+blogging}
September 23rd, 2005 at 5:26 pm
Peter,
Thanks for one of the best “Why I blog” musings I’ve seen. It’s truly “transparent” and thus all the more useful.
September 23rd, 2005 at 8:05 pm
Thanks for the feedback, Debbie. Some people believe that “transparent PR” is an oxymoron. I’m one who doesn’t.
September 25th, 2005 at 10:27 pm
The dos and don’ts list that you linked to is helpful to me as a new PR blogger. I have had a personal blog for a few years where it is OK for me to show my emotions or talk about somewhat private matters because I control who sees this blog and it’s personal. As a student in Auburn University’s PR program, I have started a blog for PR, and wonder how much can I have to say for a number of reasons.
First, how much can I contribute to the PR field? I have little experience in “real world” situations. I can notice PR around me and write posts that are similar to a case study. Second, if my posts have nothing to do with technology, is that OK? So many PR blogs talk of up-to-date technological advances, something that I am not interested in and have little knowledge about.
One way I can see my blog helping PR at this point is by explaining what PR is through simple real world applications. Many of my peers (or even family) don’t fully understand the concept of what PR is. They see it as publicity, crisis control or putting a spin to make things look better. PR is misunderstood by many people and until more people begin understanding what we do, we’ll still be seen as “flack”.
Thanks for this post. By reading what you have written about how you see your blog has helped me think about what I can write and how I can use my blog more effectively.
September 26th, 2005 at 2:36 am
[…] 블로그를 쓰기 ì „ì—? 가화만사성(å®¶å’Œè?¬äº‹æˆ?)하ë?¼ one shouldn’t blog if he or she is going through some personal crisis at home. (I believe he had himself gone through a divorce.) Your daily mood tends to manifest in your postings. Most importantly, your words become an open and indelible book. [Why I Take the Time to Blog] […]
September 26th, 2005 at 4:57 am
Personaly, I read blogs to be stirred. The blogosphere is a learning experience for me. The only posts that can hold my attention are ones about something I didn’t know before, or ones that I don’t agree with. The blogs where people to voice their opinions and thoughts can be an eye opening experience if you let it.
Posts are almost always opinionated which is unavoidable. I could not agree more about the dangers of being too opinionated. No one wants to read countless pages of someone’s vent. PR blogs are not created with the intent to ramble about what your significant other said to you the night before, but for a specific purpose (whatever that may be.) I don’t believe that anyone would voluntarily read blogs filled with nothing but empty words.
The comment section is the most important part of the blog to me. The posts are there so other people will read them. Simply posting your writing on the Internet is pointless if no one reads, or cares. The comments further the conversations and allow posts to not just be a one sided story. My point is, that’s how you learn. The comment section makes the blog relevant because not only can the post inform a reader on something new, but also the blogger himself can learn from the reply.
Posts should be written with intention. I find if you have to ask yourself “to what end,� then perhaps you should be asking yourself if the post was all that important in the first place.
September 26th, 2005 at 1:11 pm
To Marie’s point: I agree that many PR blogs arer focused on the technology that enables and empowers the (new) practice of PR. They are vital to our profession. However, like you, I have chosen to focus on the core competencies that have long-defined our industry and how they manifest (or don’t) in the news of the day. I hope that by doing so, people will have more respect for and a better understanding of what we do.
To Ashley’s point: the choice of what to write about each day is not an easy one. Some days I get charged up about what I’ve posted, other days I’m ambivalent. So many bloggers see themselves as pundits and feign profundity in their musings. I just strive to connect with the reader in some way.
Thanks for the feedback.