<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Take the Time to Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/</link>
	<description>September 19-23, 2005 :: Public Relations and Business Communications in the Age of Blogs</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Himler</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Himler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>To Marie's point:  I agree that many PR blogs arer focused on the technology that enables and empowers the (new) practice of PR.  They are vital to our profession.   However, like you, I have chosen to focus on the core competencies that have long-defined our industry and how they manifest (or don't) in the news of the day.  I hope that by doing so, people will have more respect for and a better understanding of what we do.

To Ashley's point: the choice of what to write about each day is not an easy one.  Some days I get charged up about what I've posted, other days I'm ambivalent.  So many bloggers see themselves as pundits and feign profundity in their musings.  I just strive to connect with the reader in some way.

Thanks for the feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Marie&#8217;s point:  I agree that many PR blogs arer focused on the technology that enables and empowers the (new) practice of PR.  They are vital to our profession.   However, like you, I have chosen to focus on the core competencies that have long-defined our industry and how they manifest (or don&#8217;t) in the news of the day.  I hope that by doing so, people will have more respect for and a better understanding of what we do.</p>
<p>To Ashley&#8217;s point: the choice of what to write about each day is not an easy one.  Some days I get charged up about what I&#8217;ve posted, other days I&#8217;m ambivalent.  So many bloggers see themselves as pundits and feign profundity in their musings.  I just strive to connect with the reader in some way.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 04:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Personaly, I read blogs to be stirred. The blogosphere is a learning experience for me.  The only posts that can hold my attention are ones about something I didnâ€™t know before, or ones that I donâ€™t agree with.  The blogs where people to voice their opinions and thoughts can be an eye opening experience if you let it. 

Posts are almost always opinionated which is unavoidable. I could not agree more about the dangers of being too opinionated.  No one wants to read countless pages of someoneâ€™s vent. PR blogs are not created with the intent to ramble about what your significant other said to you the night before, but for a specific purpose (whatever that may be.)  I donâ€™t believe that anyone would voluntarily read blogs filled with nothing but empty words.  

The comment section is the most important part of the blog to me.  The posts are there so other people will read them.  Simply posting your writing on the Internet is pointless if no one reads, or cares.  The comments further the conversations and allow posts to not just be a one sided story. My point is, thatâ€™s how you learn. The comment section makes the blog relevant because not only can the post inform a reader on something new, but also the blogger himself can learn from the reply.

Posts should be written with intention.  I find if you have to ask yourself  â€œto what end,â€? then perhaps you should be asking yourself if the post was all that important in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personaly, I read blogs to be stirred. The blogosphere is a learning experience for me.  The only posts that can hold my attention are ones about something I didnâ€™t know before, or ones that I donâ€™t agree with.  The blogs where people to voice their opinions and thoughts can be an eye opening experience if you let it. </p>
<p>Posts are almost always opinionated which is unavoidable. I could not agree more about the dangers of being too opinionated.  No one wants to read countless pages of someoneâ€™s vent. PR blogs are not created with the intent to ramble about what your significant other said to you the night before, but for a specific purpose (whatever that may be.)  I donâ€™t believe that anyone would voluntarily read blogs filled with nothing but empty words.  </p>
<p>The comment section is the most important part of the blog to me.  The posts are there so other people will read them.  Simply posting your writing on the Internet is pointless if no one reads, or cares.  The comments further the conversations and allow posts to not just be a one sided story. My point is, thatâ€™s how you learn. The comment section makes the blog relevant because not only can the post inform a reader on something new, but also the blogger himself can learn from the reply.</p>
<p>Posts should be written with intention.  I find if you have to ask yourself  â€œto what end,â€? then perhaps you should be asking yourself if the post was all that important in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GatorLog: A Blogger&#8217;s Monologue &#187; ë¸”ë¡œê·¸ë¥¼ ì“°ê¸° ì „ì—? ê°€í™”ë§Œì‚¬ì„±(å®¶å’Œè?¬äº‹æˆ?)í•˜ë?¼</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>GatorLog: A Blogger&#8217;s Monologue &#187; ë¸”ë¡œê·¸ë¥¼ ì“°ê¸° ì „ì—? ê°€í™”ë§Œì‚¬ì„±(å®¶å’Œè?¬äº‹æˆ?)í•˜ë?¼</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 02:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>[...] ë¸”ë¡œê·¸ë¥¼ ì“°ê¸° ì „ì—? ê°€í™”ë§Œì‚¬ì„±(å®¶å’Œè?¬äº‹æˆ?)í•˜ë?¼  one shouldnâ€™t blog if he or she is going through some personal crisis at home. (I believe he had himself gone through a divorce.) Your daily mood tends to manifest in your postings. Most importantly, your words become an open and indelible book. [Why I Take the Time to Blog] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ë¸”ë¡œê·¸ë¥¼ ì“°ê¸° ì „ì—? ê°€í™”ë§Œì‚¬ì„±(å®¶å’Œè?¬äº‹æˆ?)í•˜ë?¼  one shouldnâ€™t blog if he or she is going through some personal crisis at home. (I believe he had himself gone through a divorce.) Your daily mood tends to manifest in your postings. Most importantly, your words become an open and indelible book. [Why I Take the Time to Blog] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2005 22:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>The dos and don'ts list that you linked to is helpful to me as a new PR blogger. I have had a personal blog for a few years where it is OK for me to show my emotions or talk about somewhat private matters because I control who sees this blog and it's personal. As a student in Auburn University's PR program, I have started a blog for PR, and wonder how much can I have to say for a number of reasons.

First, how much can I contribute to the PR field? I have little experience in "real world" situations. I can notice PR around me and write posts that are similar to a case study. Second, if my posts have nothing to do with technology, is that OK? So many PR blogs talk of up-to-date technological advances, something that I am not interested in and have little knowledge about. 

One way I can see my blog helping PR at this point is by explaining what PR is through simple real world applications. Many of my peers (or even family) don't fully understand the concept of what PR is. They see it as publicity, crisis control or putting a spin to make things look better.  PR is misunderstood by many people and until more people begin understanding what we do, we'll still be seen as "flack". 

Thanks for this post. By reading what you have written about how you see your blog has helped me think about what I can write and how I can use my blog more effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dos and don&#8217;ts list that you linked to is helpful to me as a new PR blogger. I have had a personal blog for a few years where it is OK for me to show my emotions or talk about somewhat private matters because I control who sees this blog and it&#8217;s personal. As a student in Auburn University&#8217;s PR program, I have started a blog for PR, and wonder how much can I have to say for a number of reasons.</p>
<p>First, how much can I contribute to the PR field? I have little experience in &#8220;real world&#8221; situations. I can notice PR around me and write posts that are similar to a case study. Second, if my posts have nothing to do with technology, is that OK? So many PR blogs talk of up-to-date technological advances, something that I am not interested in and have little knowledge about. </p>
<p>One way I can see my blog helping PR at this point is by explaining what PR is through simple real world applications. Many of my peers (or even family) don&#8217;t fully understand the concept of what PR is. They see it as publicity, crisis control or putting a spin to make things look better.  PR is misunderstood by many people and until more people begin understanding what we do, we&#8217;ll still be seen as &#8220;flack&#8221;. </p>
<p>Thanks for this post. By reading what you have written about how you see your blog has helped me think about what I can write and how I can use my blog more effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Himler</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Himler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback, Debbie.  Some people believe that "transparent PR" is an oxymoron.  I'm one who doesn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, Debbie.  Some people believe that &#8220;transparent PR&#8221; is an oxymoron.  I&#8217;m one who doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Weil</title>
		<link>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Weil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/23/peter-himler-why-blog/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Peter,

Thanks for one of the best "Why I blog" musings I've seen. It's truly "transparent" and thus all the more useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>Thanks for one of the best &#8220;Why I blog&#8221; musings I&#8217;ve seen. It&#8217;s truly &#8220;transparent&#8221; and thus all the more useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
