Today was another great day, with lots of valuable posts and commentary on topics such as micro media measurement, the emergence of "brand journalism" as a meme, how to get media attention for small businesses, ways to use blogs for community building and the growth in importance of blogs in Spanish-speaking countries.
The comments are still piling up on topics for Day 1 and Day 2, so don't forgot to check back in with your favorite posts from time to time.
Some emerging questions and ideas:
1) Old PR/marketing's need for "deliverables" is bumping up against the New PR's delivery of "intangibles." Here and here.
2) What are the benefits to corporations of charitable sponsorships? Commercial sponsorships? There are some comments here, but I think there are many more things to be said. Stop on by and add your two cents.
3) Why don't the media what to hear about customer implementations when they concern small businesses?
4) Is there something special about American culture that lends itself to corporate blogging? Octavio writes in his post about the adoption of corporate blogging in Spanish-speaking countries:
"in order to enter the blogosphere they must take themselves off the pedestal on which they think leaders should be placed, and be closer to thousands of people in a direct way, without any obstacles...is hard for me to believe that a politician, a high-ranking official or an executive in Mexico, Spain, Peru or Argentina, would agree to write a blog."
5) Steve Rubel's interview with Jay Rosen has generated the most comments of all of the posts in this blog. Jay also posted about Global PR Blog Week on his blog, also generating lots of comments. These two posts and comment streams contain very important discussions to all PR people. Please join in!
Author: Elizabeth Albrycht | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 0 comments
Category: @ Elizabeth Albrycht | Announcements | Topic 3 Making PR Work
Learning on the fly. That is what this week has been about for me. I have never edited anything on the scale of this tremendous gathering of knowledge and personalities. Not to mention doing it in real time! I have a vast new respect for online editors everywhere.
I started writing these "Lessons Learned" posts at the encouragement of my other two partners in crime, Anthony and Constantin, with whom I have been triangulating all week via IM as we tried to keep up with the flow of information and deal with all of the little things that came up that we didn't anticipate. While they gave me some input on the content, the posts should be read as one woman's reflection on her experience, not as the "voice of the event."
My post on Tuesday was, well, a little testy. It was a reflection of approximately 14 hours spent online, virtually non-stop, doing something which is rather new to me! I truly think that the content we have produced here is really terrific.
When we started planning this event, I couldn't help but think: herding approximately 30 PR/marketing types, all of whom are leaders and experts in this field, is going to be interesting, to say the least! Yet, on the whole, it has gone rather well.
Todd remarked on the seemingly endless emails that followed the planning process of this event. Yes, there were many! But for those of us who wanted to have an active role in planning this (not everyone did, which was fine), we needed to thrash out the sometimes endless details in order to gain consensus. We are a group of people with strong opinions, and none of us wanted someone else dictating the decisions.
Yet, even with all of the discussion of details that took place, we missed some stuff.
Looking back, our guidelines for posting were too vague. For example, we never really reached consensus on how many posts people could put up per day, or if people should only post on the day of their topic or if they could post every day. We didn't finalize a look-feel for each post, including the length of the titles and whether biographical information should be put a the end of them or kept only in the biographies section. This vagueness led to us, the editors, having to make some decisions on the fly without reaching consensus with the group.
We have been guided in our decisions by one main concern: keeping the balance among authors as egalitarian as possible. Therefore, we asked people not to post every day, but rather to share their thoughts via the comments, so more great discussions could get started. We consolidated some posts. We deleted biographical information from the bottom of posts and edited headlines so that the posts' look-feel were more consistent.
Not everyone is happy with these decisions, but I think they were right ones. I wanted to share our thought process behind them with all of you, so you can correct us if you think we were wrong. Comment away!
I only have one question to throw out to the group today: is there some etiquette to trackbacking without attribution? I.e., if someone sends a ping back to a post here, but doesn't acknowledge it in any way on their own post, is that OK?
Author: Elizabeth Albrycht | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 3 comments
Category: Announcements
Visits
Total: 4,838
Average Per Day: 415
Average Visit Length: 6:00
Last Hour: 23
July 14: 1,210
This Week: 2,906
Page Views
Total: 15,768
Average Per Day: 1,380
Average Per Visit: 3.3
Last Hour: 100
July 14: 4,432
This Week: 9,658
Weekly Tracker:
Ranking of Entry Pages:
- 42: http://www.globalprblogweek.com/
- 9: http://www.globalprblogweek.co...es/topic_2_corporate_blogging/
- 8: unknown
- 6: http://www.globalprblogweek.com/archives/introduction.php
- 6: http://www.globalprblogweek.co...hives/jay_rosen_pr_needs_t.php
- 4: http://www.globalprblogweek.co...hives/bradley_peniston_tal.php
Author: Elizabeth Albrycht | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 0 comments
Category: Announcements
The following authors will be available for discussions on Thursday, July 15 (all hours EST):
Before starting a conversation, please reach an agreement on the discussion's degree of confidentiality: is it confidential, is it blogable, would you agree to be identified by name, etc.
All the authors will respond to your comments and questions throughout the day.
Author: Constantin Basturea | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 0 comments
Category: Announcements | Topic 4 Crisis Management
I plan to (briefly) update my Are Ethics Good Business? post on Friday, in its more natural setting of the State of the Profession debate, and would ask any practitioners who haven't yet done so to take part in this survey - it only takes a couple minutes. Many thanks.
Author: Philip Young | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 0 comments
Category: @ Philip Young
As strategic visionaries who have become drunk with confidence in their own thought-leadership abilities, PR-practioners often fall victim to their own hype, selling clients on the glories of the "Big Idea" du jour. Based on the belief that this new "Big Idea" will cut through the clutter in ways that no service, campaign, or previous "Big Idea" has done before, whole online initiatives are developed and executed as though this "Big Idea" existed in a vacuum — a vacuum which can be controlled through careful communication and exquisitely-crafted hype-dissemination.
Thanks to a rock-solid process and countless hours spent brainstorming with clients, a creative strategy emerges and is then handed-off to designers and developers who are then expected to perform miracles. Construction begins but deadlines start to slip as content undergoes countless rounds of review by committee after committee until the final product is rolled out to the public with great fanfare. Using traditional PR-tactics, journalists are phoned, committee-written press releases start flying into email inboxes, and television ads start flooding the airwaves. This PR-blitz puts enormous smiles on the clients' faces by displaying one's marketing savvy, and strategy-driven application of the "Big Idea". The same "Big Idea" that everyone had lost focus of and which only has relevancy while the PR-campaign is in full-swing. Following the conclusion of the campaign and the public's realization that there is no intrinsic merit to the "Big Idea", interest is soon lost and the Flash-intros and useless eye-candy ignored in favor of more compelling content.
Yet, despite the pervasiveness of the Internet and it's ever-increasing dominance in our modern lives, there are still numerous individuals — who are often powerful decision makers — clinging firmly to the "build it and they will come" philosophy of the early Web. As is shown by the popularity of blogs and the communities centered around them and their authors, Web site development and other online initiatives need not be tied so tightly to a campaign or a product launch. Web sites should stand on their own and provide information — real information, not PR spin. Users are looking for content that is useful, informative, and compelling, and sites that are simply pitching the latest FDA-approved drug — or which are hastily thrown up in response to a corporate crisis situation — will not provide the traffic needed to survive, let alone get any messaging out to the public. Without relevance, any and every site is doomed to die. Without honesty and relevance, a Web site becomes a target and once the Google bombing campaign, denial of service attacks, and blogosphere decide to strike, there often is little hope that "traditional" PR or marketing tactics can ever hope of changing the public's perceptions. Assuming that an official statement on an officially-sanctioned Web site has any more weight or authority with users than the other results appearing at the top of a Google or Yahoo! search, shows naivete on both the part of the client and their counselors.
Marketers and PR professionals need to aim for transparency and honesty in their information and strategies and successful PR campaigns are no longer based upon the tired, old press release and other official statements. In terms of ROI, the time to taken writing, revising, and approving a single press release which then must be marketed to journalists (who may have absolutely no interest in what you are discussing) is nowhere near as valuable as leveraging solid relationships with blogs and their authors, who possess an established "trust-factor" with their audience, and are key to influencing opinions. Scientifically unproven or brazenly untrue claims and hype will quickly be outed by users across the Internet, adversely affecting the reputation of you and your clients. Flooding the Web with press releases or trying to generate buzz with a risky viral marketing ploy may garner some short term buzz and interest but their effectiveness is fleeting and oftentimes ignored.
Reliance on artificial tactics such as dishonest search engine optimization techniques, astroturf campaigns, the seeding of misinformation, and the deliberate exploitation of blogs and bloggers only serve to reinforce the overwhelming distrust and negative opinions of PR-practioners which, in turn, leads to suspicion of our clients. Instead we should focus our attentions on getting to know who our audiences are and provide them with current, compelling, and topical information that exhibits our faith in them as influencers and brand advocates. Using statistics and research, specific audiences can be reached via targeted messaging yet no amount of demographic data can ever hope to promise what is gained through strong personal relationships. Communities are based on the interactions between, and open communications amongst, humans.
When developing an online PR strategy, it is no longer possible to ignore the cultures and communities that have evolved as the medium has matured. We must forgo the ill-gotten gains and short term glories of dishonest manipulation and focus our attentions on the long-term rewards inherent in a reputation of ethical responsibility and accountability built on community respect. Flooding users inboxes with thousands of email newsletters, pitching to bloggers while ignoring their individuality, and attempting to actively deceive the public should not be the methods built-in to an online strategy. Reputation management and relationship development are the keys to effective communications — and effective communications is essential to avoid further alienation from the community.
Author: Anthony V Parcero | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 1 comments
Category: @ Anthony V Parcero | Topic 3 Making PR Work
The 5 Stupidest PR Tactics That Almost Every Company Tries
Want to make sure that the resources you spend on public relations (both time and money) are spent effectively?
Then avoid, or at least very carefully weigh the downsides, as you consider the following commonly-used PR tactics.
(Note: some of these are going to strike a nerve. There are many publicists and PR professionals who have created job security for themselves by constantly executing these very tactics. And there will be many who will point to one specific time that they've used this tactic with unquestionable success. But this raises the question - what about all of the other times?)
I invite us all to consider the ultimate aim of any marketing-related resource expenditure. Isn't it to increase sales? Therefore, I believe the true measure of any resource expenditure, including PR, is whether or not it increased sales, and more importantly, whether that same amount of resources, if spent on some other tactic, (perhaps even outside of the PR arena) would have increased sales to an even higher level, both short and long term.
Based on this, I present my list of
The Five Stupidest PR Tactics:
1. Big Events
Publicists love big events. Events are a great way for them to charge off a ton of hours coordinating, arranging and staffing an event. And, unlike other PR activities, events have a clear feeling of success - the CEO can walk around, see the milling crowds all happily nibbling on $10 per serving jumbo shrimp, get slapped on the back by all of the other corporate execs as they congratulate themselves on a successful turnout, and feel "now here's a PR expenditure that finally delivered."
But did it?
The key isn't in the attendance, it's in the press coverage afterwards, and more importantly, in the sales that did or didn't result from the activity.
Frankly, it's very rare to see increased sales from a big event.
For example, the Six Flags theme parks, are running a commercial where an old guy does some amazing dancing to upbeat music. It's a pretty good ad that's probably creating increased park attendance. But in Chicago they recently held an event where they did an old guy look / dance-alike contest.
And they actually got picked up on at least one Chicago station's 10:00 news.
But here's the key question, will they get additional park traffic because of the event? (And be sure to separate the event effects from the advertising effects.) I believe the answer will be no, or at least not enough to pay for the several tens of thousands of dollars in resources that went into that event.
The one possible exception to this argument is events surrounding new product launches. But this raises the question - if the product was really that good, wouldn't it have gotten close to the same level of press without the event?
2. Sponsorships
Sponsorships strike to the heart of many managers - it's a great way to give back to the community, to get your name out there, and to (sometimes) get a tax write off for the company.
But again, does it result in increased sales?
Remember, simple exposure of your brand name does nothing unless it's connected with powerful positioning that sets you apart from your competition.
Your name alone, plastered among 42 others on the sign nobody looks at as they walk into an event does nothing to tell people why your widget is better than the other guys.
If you want to sponsor local events because they're a way to build support for your company in your community, go ahead and do so.
But call it a charitable activity and charge it to that budget. Don't kid yourself that any increased sales are going to result.
3. Sending out undifferentiated media releases
In watching the press release wires, I am constantly amazed at the drivel that most companies send out disguised as media releases.
The media wants news. Who cares that so and so just got promoted, that you have new graphics on your website, or that your widget that's been out there for 12 years is now available in shocking pink.
Give them news!
Then your releases will get printed!
Don't waste your time or money with the other stuff.
4. Sending media releases to the world
For some reason there's an attitude out there that if you can send a media release to 30 outlets, that sending it to 3,000 is a better idea.
It might be
If - it's really truly news
If - it's news on a national / international level
If - it adds value to the world rather than just struts your stuff.
If not, save your money, send it out to your pre-qualified, highly-targeted list, and use that money for something that will actually sell product!
5. Creating expensive media kits then distributing them to the world
Here's the way mail is read in the newsroom - open, glance, dump in trash.
So why send a $40 media kit? And why send it to anyone that isn't looking for news on your story right now?
Give them what they need, which can usually be done for maybe a dollar or two, and you'll get the same impact as with the big, fancy media kit that's going right into the trash.
So that it - the five stupidest things most companies do to waste their PR budget.
How many have you done?
How many will you do in the future?
Author: Don Crowther | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 9 comments
Category: @ Don Crowther | Topic 3 Making PR Work
One of the biggest factors altering the media landscape and arguably impacting marketing and public relations programs is the rapidly growing influence of word-of-mouth behavior. Once confined to one-on-one conversations and “water cooler chatter,” word-of-mouth behavior has become a significant underlying force that’s influencing public perception and decision making.
Looking back, the early Web accelerated word-of-mouth behavior with personal websites, chat rooms and bulletin boards, but today blogging and syndication has essentially turbocharged this behavior providing anyone and everyone with broadcast-like abilities for opinion sharing. This trend, combined with the eroding loyalty toward Big Media, err, Macro Media sources, is driving people to seek out and engage with online micro communities when it comes to decision making and opinion forming.
For example, I was recently in the market for a digital camera. In the process of doing some research on various models, I read a handful of product reviews and gathered up as much information as I could from company websites (product materials, data sheets, etc.). While this helped me narrow the scope of products I was considering, it didn’t help me reach a purchasing decision – so I went online and began searching through blogs and message boards. The opinions and real-world insight people shared via these mediums not only helped me determine which product to ultimately buy, but it actually changed my mind – I bought a camera model I wasn’t previously considering.
I use this example to simply illustrate the reality that people today are arguably just as likely to be influenced by something they read on a blog or a message board as they are by traditional print and broadcast outlets. And therein lies the challenge for PR: How do you measure the influence and impact of word-of-mouth behavior? Or rather, how can you better gauge what people are saying about your product and/or brand on blogs, message boards, opinion sites, and newsgroups (i.e., the Micro Media)?
The total universe of Micro Media conversations that may be either building or bulldozing your brand at any point in time is gigantic and highly unpredictable. If, however, you can capture these conversations in real-time using quantifiable (volume) and qualitative (sentiment) methods, the insight and value your organization can glean from the findings is tremendously useful.
For example, armed with a better understanding of what the Micro Media is saying about your product or service enables you to make better decisions in respect to upcoming product launches, product quality concerns, marketing effectiveness, and brand perception. This type of information also provides you with a unique ability to pinpoint product and industry evangelists and begin forging new relationships.
There are a variety of useful tools and services that can provide you with a window into how -- and who -- spreads information across the Micro Media. Specialized search engines like Technorati and Feedster are incredibly useful for ad hoc lookups on terms and topics, as are the bigger search engines like Yahoo! and Google. Additionally, “buzz indexes” like those from Daypop and Blogdex are standards by which you could conceivably measure the effectiveness and popularity of a subject. There are, however, two challenges with using these tools for measurement: With the exception of the major search engines these tools focus primarily on the blogosphere, and while this space may certainly be a hotbed of activity and influence, these tools still exclude the millions of active participants on message boards, newsgroups and forums. Additionally, attaching some form of sentiment analysis requires manual interpretation (read: a lot of time), and that potentially becomes a resource issue.
Some organizations may be perfectly content using a combination of these tools (and others) mixed perhaps with some homegrown solutions to gauge the volume and tonality of conversations relevant to their products and industries. I think the reality is that measurement models are unique to each company and as such it’s nearly impossible to recommend a one-size-fits-all approach. Especially when you’re attempting to monitor an audience as large and unwieldy as the Internet itself.
There are, however, two companies that I think offer very compelling services for mining, monitoring and analyzing Micro Media activity -- Intelliseek and BuzzMetrics.
While Intelliseek refers to the Micro Media as “Consumer Generated Media," the audience makeup is exactly the same (i.e., bloggers, message board posters, newsgroups users, etc.). Intelliseek offers some very powerful technology for tracking the Micro Media and turning the results into “actionable insight for companies and brands.” They currently offer a popular free tool called BlogPulse that allows you to create historical trend graphs on keywords as they appeared in the blogosphere over the course of several weeks. Via its paid products and services, the company offers tremendously compelling data mining and reporting capabilities.
BuzzMetrics offers similar services in that it takes large amounts of unstructured data, mines it for relevancy and timeliness, and then adds a sentiment analysis on top. The company focuses on identifying industry influencers and evangelists, and offers several tools for capturing a more holistic view of the Micro Media landscape.
Both companies, by the way, are founders of the recently formed Word-of-Mouth Marketing Association (WOMMA).
I think companies are increasingly becoming aware of the influence of the Micro Media and are eager to explore ways they can better capture and understand how this audience is responding to products and services and ultimately how this is shaping public perception and brand loyalty. To do this successfully requires that companies have a strategy and the tools in place for measuring the impact of their efforts.
Success also requires that companies be prepared to engage with this audience at a new level – eye level. Corporate blogs, official message board representatives and intelligent Micro Media relations strategies are all fundamental elements for moving in that direction. Probably more important than anything else, however, is acceptance of the fact that building relationships with this burgeoning community involves not just talking, but a lot of listening.
The rules of engagement are different with the Micro Media and as such, it requires that PR practitioners quickly adapt and re-evaluate how to define and measure success.
Author: Mike Manuel | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 2 comments
Category: @ Mike Manuel | Topic 3 Making PR Work
One could take 'brand journalism' to its logical conclusion, where everyone –including its employees and even the CEO is communicating. This internal-external communications approach will certainly defy The Cluetrain Manifesto's Thesis # 53 which states that: "There are two conversations going on. One inside the company. One in the market."
Here are two examples of the CEO taking on an unmanaged PR role: It’s one thing to complain about how CEO tend to varnish the truth. But it’s a PR person’s nightmare to hear a CEO describe the company he leads as “Formal, middle-class and boring.”
And the company? It's Marks and Spencer! Marks and Sparks' Chief Executive, Stuart Rose, described his company in such terms, and the cryptic statement was buried in a financial news story about how the company would be selling off its financial services arm (M&S Money) to HSBC Holdings.
Then there may be CEOs who, distrusting PR, want to do it themselves. Ross Mayfield is one of them, who commented in his blog that:
“As a CEO, I have grown to distrust outsourcing PR beyond coordination, especially when we can extend our reach by ourselves authentically and the strategy is core…A discussion on transparency needs to be complimented by one on ethics. If both are not addressed, sunshine is the best disinfectant and disintermediation is inevitable."
So what do you think?
1. Should the concept of blogging go this far?
2. What if Sir Richard Branson, and Bill Gates started blogging? (Gates is rumored to be doing it, but it's not public. Except for parodies of it. ) Would you read their posts, rather than their press releases? Post your comments in the space below.
Author: Angelo Fernando | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 5 comments
Category: @ Angelo Fernando | Topic 3 Making PR Work
The most important thing about the technology in front of you is that it does not get in the way of the message you need to promote. So if you want to penetrate the online world with themes that sell product for your client, your flavour of IT cannot be daunting in any form or fashion. Although I may rewarm some familiar points, I believe they bear mentioning in the context of making PR work.
[Declared interest: I have used Radio Userland since late 2000, Movable Type since 2001, Blogger in 2002, Live Journal in 2003 and Typepad for a year. Each has attractive features.]
If you decide to embrace blogging, ensure your blogware allows you to syndicate separate channels. This means you need to be able to quickly designate a new directory on your blog AND that directory must have its own RSS feed. The separate directories and distinct feeds give you presence, reach, and standing.
Set up your blog to facilitate efficient printing. Many potential customers want to print out what they read. The templates used on some blogs get in the way of that--just like some online newspapers fail to render their content in a friendly way. A simple Javascript PRINT link will normally generate a clean page with one-inch margins and no extraneous decorations around the sides of the text.
The faster senior management accepts the reason for blogging the better. When you get up-channel endorsement, it's time to ensure people at various levels of your organisation can nominate content for posting to the blog. To prevent problems, your blogging tool should let some be superusers, others be editors, authors and junior authors. Each category has distinct levels of capability.
Add specialty content to your blog. Thinks like link lists, blogrolls and newsfeeds will ultimately help extend your reach.
Be ready to prune, correct and delete comments and trackbacks. If you let your blog become a two-way Web experience, spammers and link sluts will show up on your site.
Work out time to upload new content and clean out unwanted debris. The blogging experience should not add to your work day--it should streamline existing processes and make you more efficient.
Listen to your referrers. People who visit your site often arrive for intriguing reasons. Their search engine referrer string can suggest new target markets, emerging prospects, and competitive interests. You must mine that visitor intelligence or you miss a valuable resource that is tapping at your windows.
Don't be afraid to ego surf and see where your URL, your client's products or your memes stand in the minds of aggregators like Technorati and Feedster.
Have fun blogging. It's one of the most enjoyable activities you can get paid to do.
Author: Bernard Goldbach | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 1 comments
Category: @ Bernard Goldbach | Topic 3 Making PR Work
Bradley Peniston is Managing Editor of Defense News and author of Around the World with the US Navy.
ALICE MARSHALL: You said you kept a blog in 1998, what was it about and is it still online?
BRADLEY PENISTON: I was on assignment for Navy Times, traveling around the world with the U.S. fleet. I published a daily entry to Navy Times for about two months, trying to keep things a little lighter than my weekly dispatches to the paper. Alas, the posts were lost in the sands of a redesign a few years ago.
ALICE MARSHALL: How have blogs affected the news gathering process at Defense News? Do your correspondents read Riverbend, Kurdo's World and the other Iraqi blogs? I believe some of the soldiers succeeded in keeping blogs; how did that affect your news gathering process? What other, if any, blogs are popular at Defense News?
BRADLEY PENISTON: Some reporters read blogs; others don't. I scan about 60 blogs daily with an RSS newsreader; it helps me catch things that haven't hit the major media yet.
ALICE MARSHALL: How have blogs affected your relationship with your readers?
BRADLEY PENISTON: We don't have public blogs yet (though our librarian keeps one for internal use). We publish on our conventional web site. But we do know that bloggers post links to those stories, which probably boosts the readership.
ALICE MARSHALL: Do readers send you links from blogs?
BRADLEY PENISTON: I haven't received many, but others might.
ALICE MARSHALL: On a less bloggy note, how would you compare your reporting to mainstream news media? Other than the obvious difference of being a trade paper. My memory of your reporting in the summer of 2002 was there was a far more skeptical than broadcast news, other Gannet properties and certainly the New York Times or the Washington Post. Do you remember it the same way?
BRADLEY PENISTON: We report on the business and policy of defense, and pitch our stories at decision makers in government, militaries, and industry in more than 80 countries. We don't try to be more or less skeptical than anyone else; we just try to bring our expertise to bear and report the truth as we find it.
ALICE MARSHALL: I do not ever remember seeing an anonymous source in Defense News or any publication of the Army Times Publishing Co. What is your policy concerning anonymous sources?
BRADLEY PENISTON: We do use them; it would be virtually impossible to cover the military in depth without them. But we try to be very judicious, and push to get our sources to go on the record.
ALICE MARSHALL: Thank you Bradley Peniston
Author: Alice Marshall | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 0 comments
Category: @ Alice Marshall | Topic 3 Making PR Work
Blogging is new to many of us who never imagined that something akin to gossip and story telling would impact deeply entrenched professions such as advertising, PR and journalism. But it has, giving rise to a journalism effect that fills the gaps of credibility in branding, politics, journalism, and mass marketing. My topic is marketing communications. As I noted in my backgrounder the people at the periphery have a voice –and the reach— that those at the center once enjoyed.
Our modern variants of gossip –marketing communications (which is all about telling our commercial stories) and public relations (which is used to narrate particular angles of a story) – have quietly eclipsed the corporate video, the press conference, the product launch, and the celebrity-studded TV commercial. The most interesting seem to be the unofficial storytellers--the ‘unauthorized’ corporate bloggers, the ‘self embedded’ journalists-blogger posting stories from the war zone, the ‘citizen journalists’ reporting for OhMyNews in South Korea, and the ‘un-ad agencies’ such as Crispin Porter + Bogusky. Even a group of consumers who release viral content for benign reasons or some form of activism have an audience.
These communicators at the periphery have realized that people and institutions at the center --the corporate icons and the traditional gatekeepers— have lost their credibility. Notice how it’s not just the Ken Lays and Martha Stewarts of this world who are being put away. Also being sidelined are information and image brokers from Tom Brokaw (whom, we learn, is losing audiences), McCann-Erickson (a powerful global advertising network/conglomerate which is losing accounts to hot shops.) And yes, even newspapers have lost their credibility, as a recent Pew Research study shows.
Whose brand stories will people listen to? It depends on who provides more relevant content, rather than who crafts the best press release. Consider the GlaxoSmithkline 'story.' No matter how you spin it, when New York Attorney General filed a lawsuit against their product, Paxil, the patients took to the message boards.
Or take BBC journalist, Stuart Hughes, who’s Iraq 'audio blog' on the Web, is riveting journalism, more so, because it is not an official news report filed through Hughes’ employer. These are seemingly isolated examples of how spin, brand management (managed by one-time ‘brand guardians,’) damage control, and intermediation are not always what the audience wants.
This is not necessarily a pessimistic view of communications. We don’t have to look to Blogs per se for the answer. The concept of blogging, of transparency, and allowing multiple contributions is being embraced by the advertising and marketing world, even as we speak.
Larry Light, the chief marketing officer of McDonald’s proposed a curious marketing idea last month. He called it ‘brand journalism’ which is not a very accurate label for what he was proposing, since it is neither journalism, nor branding. “As a mass brand…we marketed a mass message through the mass media appealing to masses of undifferentiated consumers,” he said. But “customers will not accept monotonous, repetition of the same simplistic message. They want a dynamic, creative chronicle.” Mr. Light was not overtly referring to online ‘chronicles’ but he did have in mind the rich tapestry of multiple opinions, and daily inputs to this chronicle: “It means telling the many facets of our brand story every day in 119 countries.”
And in the face of those he warned as the ‘positionistas’ (those brand advocates who defend the ‘positioning’ theory of the one-voice, one-look, and one-brand image) he said that McDonald’s would redefine its brand communication in a “non advertising-centric world” where like the tapestries of old, this thing called ‘brand journalism’ would be an “endless story” when unfurled over time.
Welcome to the non advertising-centric world of marketing communications!
Author: Angelo Fernando | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 6 comments
Category: @ Angelo Fernando | Topic 3 Making PR Work
Global PR Blog Week Day 3: PR Function To Head Up New Blog Brand Threat
The Speed of Disruptive Messaging via RSS and Blog Pings are Changing the Rules of Engagement in the World of Micro Communications
Customers are actually starting to talk back to company brands through blogs (just as Cluetrain Manifesto authors, Doc Searls, Chris Locke, and David Weinberger predicted they would). One way of looking at the threat and why marketing techniques like “Brand Journalism” are arising is, as Elizabeth Albrycht of Corporate PR agreed, through the lens of political economy or power. "In the past, the company controlled communications. PR departments and employee relations (all backed by brand messaging) existed to spread the company vision. And, at the same time, these messages would assert the power of the corporation and its brands."Today, new technologies (such as blogging and RSS feeds) interrupt that power structure and its brand messages. Rather than being a technology of control (the press release, the corporate meeting, the annual report), blogging is a technology of un-control. On her blog, Albrycht said, "Blogging is one of those new technologies that makes the negotiations about power visible, vs. hiding them in a black box. Power needs secrecy and control to survive." Blogging threatens the power of brands and their message control because blogs facilitate open dialogues with customers. Or, as the Amazon review of Cluetrain Manifesto said, "In their view, the lowly customer service rep wields far more power and influence in today's marketplace than the well-oiled front office PR machine."
Brand Threat: Customers Talking Back
It’s obvious through McDonald’s corporate announcement that big marketing is turning to new media channels as print and web collateral, solely based on one-way branding, is not going to meet the new brand threat.
The universal message with its catchy ads, glitzy events and the "build it and they will come" attitude towards marketing is being turned away from.
The exact threat? The proliferation of RSS and related site syndication technologies have all rapidly given a voice to people who previously had no way of expressing their opinions. The Internet is no longer a closed-medium where knowledge does not affect or crossover into the offline, "real" world. Today’s viral marketing campaign can often alter opinions, change views, and sometimes lead to unforeseen consequences (the effect of the movie Super Size Me on McDonald’s being one of them). Combine these newfound customer interactive feedback mechanisms with an almost total lack of online censorship, and the general openness inherent in the Internet allows individuals and small groups the ability to take advantage of technology to reach, interact and amass with audiences in ways that no other media outlet has ever previously allowed.
But what exactly is it about a blog, you might be asking yourself that makes it so entirely different from the personal and corporate websites we all built extensively before the downturn in the economy back in 2001? Answer: blogs and RSS feeds are threats to brands. Because of their instantaneous and global publishing capabilities, blogs and RSS feeds (effectively customer brand touch points) can quickly catch brand managers and their strategies entirely off guard (making their current often static online website collateral seem non-responsive and old in comparison to the new global conversations now starting to take place). No worries. The next step is simply integrating blogs within websites. But, point is, on those blogs are conversations that need managing. By whom? PR. Why? Because disruptive messages that campaigns like Super Size Me and Fahrenheit 9/11 send out to audiences threaten brands (be it McDonalds or the Republican Party). But don’t think for a second that the “old” but effective approach to online marketing (sending out branded emails and canvassing highly-branded web sites with mind share banner ads) will work to effectively handle the new brand threat of blogging and talkback interactivity. Massive mindshare capture campaigns, while effective elsewhere, won’t help facilitate the conversation that corporate brands need to develop for themselves in the blogosphere. The previous approach, which ushered in the premise of our entire new online economy, was progressive and new at the time, but is seen as too "one-way" (and non-conversational) in the blogosphere. Monolithic marketing, atleast online, looks broken.
Blogger Brand Cocktail Party
“Brand Journalism” has been developed by a Fortune 100 company to meet the new brand threat. Even Seth Godin, the marketing guru behind several new economy books about e-marketing, praised McDonald’s for realizing that monolithic marketing is broken. But Godin pointed out though that the marketer doesn't get to run the conversation that Light is inviting. As Godin said, “It's not really ‘Brand Journalism’ that's happening, you see, it's ‘Brand Cocktail Party!’ You get to set the table and invite the first batch of guests, but after that the conversation is going to happen with or without you.”
Summary
McDonald's and Seth Godin acknowledging that marketers are losing control of their brand marketing programs online? Who to put in charge to help marketers regain their online voices and direct their online conversations with customers? PR. This is a great opportunity for PR to take leadership of the strategic role of integrating the voice of the customer between corporate IT and marketing. Any Fortune 1000 company that has a threat (blogs) also has a need. PR people...fill that need. Company threats are met by the opportunities of other services. Conversations developing online should be answered. By PR.
Author: Robb Hecht | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 0 comments
Category: @ Robb Hecht | Topic 3 Making PR Work
If you already blog, you use a tool that can promote clients. Elements of your writing become part of a larger mass of information that is trawled and combed by Internet search engines. Linkages between your message and other related themes bubble up. Those linkages become part of directories of information. Before venturing into public space with any sort of a message, it would be wise to know how to make the best use of your effort. This knowledge enhances return on the time and money invested in forming, promoting and tracking messages.
As a PR lecturer, I teach some checklists that help measure return on investment (ROI) for clients. We mount campaigns during the academic term that invoke specific rules of thumb. If we pretend the "Global PR Blog Week" is a client, we can tick off the checklist items step-by-step as our promotion campaign evolves.
The three phases of the campaign:
- Preparation
- Implemetation
- Evaluation
1. Preparation.
2. Implementation You should polish most of the implementation tasks well before the campaign starts. Many campaigns start the minute an embargo expires. Here are the steps.
3. Evaluation. This stage documents measureable results. You must monitor the program’s implementation. You must assess its impact and efficiency of various nodes of information.
Author: Bernard Goldbach | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 0 comments
Category: @ Bernard Goldbach | Topic 3 Making PR Work
Reporters work for their editors - Mary Marshall
Those of us who have the privilege of representing small business always struggle with the issue of newsworthiness. If Megakluge announces the future release of Vaporware 1.0, due to ship three years from now, it will be treated as news for no reason save that it came from Megakluge. But if you call from TheLittleEngineThatCould Technology Corp., you have to deal with the “Who are they?” issue. Presumably, your client hired you to solve that problem.
It is critical to have a detailed understanding of TheLittleEngineThatCould’s product and what problem it solves. The story will almost always revolve around solving a problem that had not been previously addressed. You must determine who cares about that problem and why it is news.
Begin at the end. Since you want the story to generate sales, begin with the prospects. Who buys from TheLittleEngineThatCould? Are they network administrators? Civil servants? Financial advisors? Chief information officers? You must know your audience before you make your pitch.
What sort of publication do TheLittleEngineThatCould’s customers read? A favorable review in an obscure professional journal may be a better placement than a national newspaper. Only when you know whom you are writing for can you begin to formulate the pitch. Have a specific reader in mind as you write. This inspires livelier copy.
The reason Technoflak begins with the reader rather than the editor is that it is too easy to concentrate so much on the news organization that we lose sight of our purpose: to communicate our client’s message to the pubic in a way that inspires trust. Always remember that you are talking to the public, not the reporter.
The other reason Technoflak begins with the reader is that it is easier to pitch the newsworthiness of stories if you can point to specific readers. If you can say something along the lines of “both the network administrators and the security officers who read your magazine will be interested in this story because...” your message will have a better chance of generating a response.
If TheLittleEngineThatCould has an inherently newsworthy customer, the State Department or National Institute for Health(NIH) for instance, you should pitch the State Department or NIH as the story. This is very difficult as you have two different organizations that must sign off on the story before you pitch it. However, your chances of successful placement are greatly enhanced.
Offer exclusives: send email along the lines of “TheLittleEngineThatCould has a new web services application that provides for world peace and thin thighs, please let me know by Friday if The Weekly Whiz is interested.” Setting a deadline encourages a response and frees you to offer the pitch to a rival news organization if The Weekly Whiz fails to respond.
Editors want readers, clients want customers. Finding the place where their interests converge is the secret to all successful story pitches. Reporters want stories that will grab the attention of readers, impress editors and win a promotion. If they don’t want these things they are not doing their job. Persuade them that TheLittleEngineThatCould is moving down their readers’ track, and they will use your story.
Author: Alice Marshall | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 5 comments
Category: @ Alice Marshall | Topic 3 Making PR Work
A pesar de ser la segunda lengua más hablada en el mundo, el español está a años luz de tener una presencia similar en el mundo internet. Esta situación puede trasladarse perfectamente a la blogósfera.
Apenas un par de medios de comunicación iberoamericanos ofrecen RRS: el diario español El Mundo y el argentino Clarín. Aunque los blogs se están volviendo visibles en los medios de comunicación y están comenzando a convertirse en un tema de investigación, aún es cosa de pequeños grupos “evangelistas”, quienes promueven su uso… pero esto puede cambiar en poco tiempo.
Frente a este gran reto, los profesionales de las relaciones públicas de habla hispana tienen que ver las enormes oportunidades que otros colegas, fundamentalmente quienes tienen el inglés como su lengua materna, aprovechan para sus clientes, sus empresas e, incluso, para ellos mismos.
Quizás sea más fácil aceptar para un anglosajón, con una cultura diferente, que para entrar en la blogósfera hay que bajarse del pedestal en el que piensan que deben situarse los líderes y acercarse a miles de personas de una manera directa y sin cortapisas.
Se me hace difícil creer que un político, un alto funcionario o un directivo mexicano, español, peruano o argentino, acceda a escribir un blog directamente. Es más, salvo sectores y casos puntuales, la utilización de los blogs para mantener una comunicación fluida con sus diferentes públicos sigue siendo limitada entre partidos políticos, gobiernos e incluso a nivel empresarial.
En los últimos años, ha sido un gran avance que los líderes hayan visto las ventajas que significa tener una página web y la hayan incluido en su campaña de comunicación.
Sin embargo, para algunos sectores de la población de habla hispana, el mundo de internet aún les es ajeno, difícil y caro, por lo que descartan su uso para comunicarse… y la blogósfera ofrece justamente lo contrario a todo eso: es un medio cercano a la gente, de un manejo bastante sencillo y con un coste muy reducido que, aprovechándose de los recursos que pueden encontrarse en innumerables sitios web, puede ser prácticamente gratuito.
En este sentido, es fácil hablar de que los blogs pueden convertirse en un elemento “democratizador”, con unas posibilidades para cambiar la relación tradicional entre las fuente y los medios con el público.
Los blogs harán posible el “periodismos participativo”, con el que podrán acercarse los problemas de gente de la calle a otras personas con sus mismas dificultades y preocupaciones. Las posibilidades son interminables en sociedades muy dadas a la falta de transparencia en el actuar del gobierno, de las grandes empresas e incluso con medios de comunicación con débil credibilidad.
De hecho, ya está sucediendo en varios países de habla hispana, al igual que en el mundo anglosajón, una explosión de canales que ofrecen información alternativa a la que contienen los medios tradicionales. Están surgiendo miles de blogs que reflexionan, califican y denuncian, no sólo las actuaciones gubernamentales o de los partidos políticos, sino productos, servicios o los planes que muchas empresas llevan a cabo.
Asimismo, entre las pequeñas y medianas empresas, es posible que los blogs puedan ser vistos como la posibilidad real de acceder a internet, sin necesidad de destinar una gran cantidad de recursos ni a tener que depender de informáticos que no necesariamente saben del negocio o que incluso no conocen de comunicación.
Quizás aquí esté el meollo del asunto. Por estos motivos pienso que hay muchas posibilidades por explotar en los blogs por el sector de las relaciones públicas en los países hispanohablantes.
Es posible que en un medio plazo los blogs hispanos alcancen la misma importancia que están ganando poco a poco, pero firmemente, las bitácoras de autores en países como Estados Unidos, Reino Unido, Canadá o Australia.
Ahora mismo, se me hace difícil creer que blogs realmente independientes, es decir, aquellos que no sean parte de importantes grupo de comunicación o que no estén escritos por periodistas adscritos a grandes redacciones que mantienen sus bitácoras de forma paralela a su actividad principal, sean acreditados como medios en actos de importancia como campañas de partidos políticos como ya está sucediendo en EEUU y próximamente en Reino Unido.
En este sentido, el sector de las RRPP en los países hispanos debe estar preparado para obtener el mayor provecho de este fenómeno.
¿Cómo? Me atrevo a establecer unas líneas de actuación.
* Detectar aquellos blogs que tienen un buen nivel de visitas y ordenándolos por categorías: tecnología, política, medios, etc. Esto ya lo están haciendo directorios como Bitácoras.net, Blogdir.com, Blogsmexico.com, Blogalia.com, por mencionar algunos. Habrá que estar abiertos a ver todo tipo de bitácoras y saber que habrá ocasiones en que no compartamos los puntos de vista de los autores, pero que es importante que contemos con ellos.
Pongamos el caso de las páginas web sobre videojuegos. Hay ocasiones en que niños con apenas 12 años se convierten en verdaderos líderes de opinión, que son capaces de destrozar el lanzamiento de un nuevo juego en el que se invirtieron miles o a veces hasta millones de euros.
* Adentrarse a la blogósfera con el objetivo de conocer el nuevo medio, sus herramientas, sus posibilidades y limitaciones, así como los autores más conocidos, aunque no sean de habla hispana.
Puede parecer una obviedad, pero hay muchas personas que nunca habrán oído hablar de RSS, Feeds, Posts, pero tampoco de bitácoras, sindicación de contenidos, enlaces, ni nada por el estilo.
Un consultor de relaciones públicas no puede sugerir a su cliente que lance un blog sin haberle informado previamente de todo lo que tiene que saber para tener éxito y, sobre todo, no se puede dar el lujo de no saber responder a una pregunta que se le plantee sobre la blogósfera.
* Antes de lanzar un blog corporativo o institucional se debe tener una estrategia clara de lo que se busca trasmitir y entender que el medio tiene su “net-etiqueta”, es decir, sus códigos propios, lo que tiene implicaciones desde la asiduidad, las fuentes, la forma, el tono de la comunicación… y, por supuesto, la respuesta del público.
Nos podemos encontrar que una buena idea puede dar resultados mediocres si se eligen las tácticas inadecuadas. En este sentido, un blog es una herramienta más entre todas las disponibles para las relaciones públicas. Eso sí, ofrece unas posibilidades únicas que otras no tienen.
* Hacer que el blog sea relevante, pero no olvidando que se trata de una bitácora. Hay quien sigue pensando que los blogs son diarios de adolescentes, en parte porque es verdad y no tiene nada de malo, de ahí la flexibilidad del medio.
Por eso, en el momento de lanzar un blog, hay que encontrar un equilibrio entre las características del medio con los objetivos de la organización. No se puede poner posts sin sustancia, ni esperar demasiado a actualizar la bitácora.
En este sentido, si una empresa no tiene la capacidad para mantener una comunicación continua con su público, ya sea por razones estratégicas, por limitaciones legales o de otro tipo, quizás una página web cumpla mejor con sus objetivos.
* Advertir que los resultados pueden ser a medio plazo. Es uno de los principales retos a los que se debe enfrentar cualquier profesional de las relaciones públicas, no sólo con los blogs, sino utilizando cualquier herramienta.
Quizás en el caso de las bitácoras el reto sea mayor por la novedad del medio y, en el caso de algunos países iberoamericanos, por la baja penetración de internet.
* Ser “evangelistas” de los blogs. No sólo hay que conocer el medio, hay que ser parte de él. Esta es la única manera en la que se podrá ofrecer a los clientes una consultoría adecuada. No se trata de ser un gurú con miles de visitas al día, pero sí de estar familiarizado con la blogósfera, de conocer el quién-es-quién. La única manera de persuadir a alguien es estando convencido de aquello que se predica.
La mejor tarjeta de presentación de un consultor que sugiera utilizar las ventajas de un blog para una organización debe incluir, además de su email, la dirección de su bitácora.
Habrá muchas más cosas que hacer, pero este puede ser un buen comienzo para el sector de las relaciones públicas hispanohablante, que tiene que ver a los blogs como una herramienta con un potencial enorme.
Aún está por verse si el fenómeno que la blogósfera representa para algunos países se extiende al resto del mundo. La aún baja penetración de conexión de internet en los hogares de los países latinoamericanos, una incipiente cultura del uso de las nuevas tecnologías de la información y una manera distinta de entender las relaciones sociales, serán los principales condicionantes para que este fenómeno se extienda como en los países anglosajones o puede que surja un movimiento diferente que todavía no ha explotado. Ya veremos.. aunque lo mejor es que nos vayamos preparando.
Author: Octavio Rojas | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 0 comments
Category: @ Octavio Rojas | Topic 3 Making PR Work
In spite of being the second most spoken language in the world, Spanish is light-years away from having a similar presence on the Internet. This situation can be transferred perfectly to the blogosphere.
Only two media in Spanish speaking countries offer RSS: the Spanish newspaper El Mundo and the Argentine Clarín. Although the blogs are becoming more visible in the media and are becoming a research topic, still they are something of small “evangelist groups”, who promote its use… but this can change in little time.
To face this great challenge, Spanish-speaking PR professionals have to identify the enormous opportunities that other colleagues, fundamentally those whose native language is English, use for their clients, their businesses and, even for themselves.
Perhaps it would be easier for Anglo-saxons, with a different culture, to accept that in order to enter the blogosphere they must take themselves off the pedestal on which they think leaders should be placed, and be closer to thousands of people in a direct way, without any obstacles.
It is hard for me to believe that a politician, a high-ranking official or an executive in Mexico, Spain, Peru or Argentina, would agree to write a blog. Furthermore, except for some industries (i.e. IT), the use of blogs to maintain direct communication with their audiences continues to be limited to political parties, governments and even successful businesses.
In recent years, there has been a great advance, in which leaders have taken into account the advantages of having a web page and have included it in their communication campaign.
Nevertheless, for some industries of the Spanish-speaking countries, the Internet still is a foreign, difficult and expensive tool, and because of this they disregard its use to communicate with their audiences. The blogosphere offers the exact opposite of this: it is a communication tool close to the people, easy-to-use and with such a reduced price that, with so many resources available on the Internet, it can be practically free of charge.
It is easy to say that blogs could become a “democratizing” element with real possibilities to change the traditional relationship between sources and the media with the public.
Blogs will make possible the “participative journalism”, through which it will be possible to connect the problems of real people to other individuals with the same difficulties and worries. The possibilities are endless in societies that are used to the lack of transparency in government activities and large businesses, and even with media that lack credibility.
In fact, what is already happening in a lot of Spanish-speaking countries, as in the Anglo-saxon world, is an explosion of blogs that offer alternative information to the traditional media. Thousands of blogs are appearing to reflect, qualify and denounce, not only the governmental actions or those of political parties, but products, services or even plans that many businesses are carrying out.
Also, it is possible that the blogs can be seen as the real possibility for the small and medium-size businesses to access the Internet, without needing to provide a large quantity of resources or having to depend on IT people that don’t necessarily understand the business or communication strategies.
Perhaps here is the heart of the matter. These reasons make me think that there are many possibilities for the public relations industry in the Spanish-speaking countries to explore blogs. It is possible that very soon the blogs in Spanish may reach the same importance that other blogs are gradually but firmly gaining, in countries such as United States, United Kingdom, Canada or Australia.
Right now, I don’t believe that really independent blogs -that is to say, those that are not part of important communication groups or that are not written by professional journalists that update their blogs parallelly to their main activity- may be accredited like mainstream media in important events such as political campaigns, as is already happening in the US, and soon in the United Kingdom.
The public relations industry in Spanish-speaking countries should be prepared to obtain the maximum profit of this phenomenon.
How? I will tackle this through some proposed plans of action.
* Identify those blogs that have a good level of hits and organize them in categories: technology, political, media, etc. There are some directories that do this like Bitácoras.net, Blogdir.com, Blogsmexico.com, Blogalia.com, to mention a few. We should be open to see all kinds of blogs, keeping in mind that there will be occasions in which we won’t share the authors’ points of view, but that is important that we take them into consideration.
Let’s take the the case of the videogames web pages. There are occasions in which children with barely 12 years become true opinion leaders, who are capable of destroying the launch of a new game in which thousands or even millions of euros were invested.
* Enter into the blogosphere with the objective of understanding the new medium, its tools, its possibilities and limitations, as well as the best-known authors, although they not be Spanish-speaking.
It may seem obvious, but there are many people that have never heard about RSS, feeds, posts, blogs, syndicated content, links or anything along these lines.
A public relations consultant can’t suggest that his or her clients launch a blog without having previously informed the client about what it takes to be successful and, above all, he or she can’t afford not to know an answer to an issue that may be presented in the blogosphere.
* Before launching a corporate or institutional blog, one should have a clear strategy of what he or she hopes to be communicate and should understand that the blogosphere has its own “net-etiquette”, that is to say, its own codes, that have implications regarding updating, information sources, the form, the tone of the communication… and, of course, the feedback of the public.
We can find that a good idea may produce mediocre results if inadequate tactics are chosen. In this sense, a blog is one more tool among the many available for public relations. And, yes, it offers some unique possibilities that other don’t have.
* Make the blog relevant, but take into account that it is a blog. There are people that keep thinking that the blogs are newspapers for teen-agers, in part because it is true. However this is not something bad at all since this shows how flexible blogs are.
Therefore, at the moment of launching a blog, one must find an equilibrium among the characteristics of the blogosphere with the objectives of the organization. One cannot do is to create irrelevant posts or wait too long to update the blog.
If a business does not have the capacity to maintain a continuous communication with its audience, whether for strategic reasons or legal limitations of another type, perhaps a web page is better for its objectives.
* Note that results can’t be immediate. It is one of the main challenges to all public relations professionals that should be faced, not only with the blogs, but when using any other tool.
Perhaps in the case of the blogs the challenge is greater because of the novelty of the medium and, in the case of some Latin American countries, by the low penetration of Internet.
* Be “blog evangelists”. One must know not only the blogosphere, one must be part of it. This is the only way in which a consultant will be able to offer his or her clients an adequate consultancy. It is not a matter of being a guru with thousands of visits a day, but it is necessary to be comfortable with the blogosphere and knowing who-is-who. The only way to persuade someone is being convinced of that which is preached.
The best business card of a consultant that uses the advantages of a blog for an organization should include, apart from its email, his or her blog addresss.
There will be many of things to do, but this could be a good beginning for the Spanish-speaking PR industry, that has yet to see blogs as a tool with a huge potential.
We must wait to see if the “blog phenomenon”, that is taking place in a number of countries, will spread to the rest of the world. The low internet penetration in Latin American countries, an incipient culture of the use of IT and a different way of understanding the social relations, will be the main obstacles that will determine if this phenomenon spreads as it has in the Anglo-Saxon countries, or maybe it will be possible that a different movement arises with local particularities that haven’t been exploited yet. We will wait and see… and we better be prepared.
(Ahora incluyo la versión en castellano...)
Author: Octavio Rojas | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 3 comments
Category: @ Octavio Rojas | Topic 3 Making PR Work
Back in the late 90s, it seemed every other business plan I saw had "building community" as a major component. These were the wild and wacky days of the web gold rush, and the one identified way to make money was to consolidate lots of eyeballs and push ads at them. Of course, the same few thousand people and the same few hundred ad buyers were targeted in all of the 14,876 plans or so I had the pleasure of perusing. Thus the Oh-Ohs and the resounding thud heard 'round the world.
Yet, the drive towards "building communities" has not disappeared. Witness the stellar growth of LinkedIn, Friendster, Orkut. Yet [hand to ear]...do I hear the whistle of a coming thud? Is the buzz on "social networks" already dying?
I think there is something fundamentally broken about the way organizations have birthed online communities up until now. And in the face of a dramatic (for Americans at least) cultural decline in joining communities (as chronicled in Robert Putman's book Bowling Alone), organizations that are interested in fostering community need to adopt new strategies and tactics to be successful.
Before I get to what is broken, first I thought it would be useful to list the four characteristics of community as defined by McMillan and Chavis, which are the most widely accepted among community researchers. [This materials comes from an article by Anita Blanchard that is part of the excellent new gathering of academic work on blogs: Into the Blogosphere.]
* Feelings of membership: Feelings of belonging to, and identifying with, the community;
* Feelings of influence: Feelings of having influence on, and being influenced by, the community;
* Integration and fulfillment of needs: Feelings of being supported by others in the community while also supporting them; and
* Shared emotional connection: Feelings of relationships, shared history, and a “spirit” of community.
So, if we take these traits and apply them to virtual communities, which I think you can without too much trouble (read the papers on virtual communities at Into the Blogsphere for more on that), we begin to see where the problem I mentioned earlier lies.
To date, communities have usually been created for the primary benefit of the organizer to sell eyeballs or to create the illusion of mass support of an objective (environmental organizations are a good example here). These creative people have come up with a variety of benefits to the members, which they then market in the goal of getting more members. The organizers of community are enamored with numbers. But, let's be careful here. In fact, for virtually any membership community, only two to 20 percent of members are active in any way at all. And generally, the number is closer to the low end than the high end. (Source)
So, if you are interested in forming a vital community of contributing members, you have to overcome the inertia of built-in, cultural passivity. (Again, I am speaking mainly of the American public today, but I suspect the lessons can be applied in many other countries.) Clearly, that is something that isn't going to happen overnight. However, there are some approaches you can take, guided by the attributes of successful communities I listed above.
First of all, you must create a framework around which the community can grow organically. Trying to force fit a structure onto a group of people doesn't encourage participation! MeetUp is a great example of an organization that created a few simple tools then backed off. Now, we can argue that MeetUp itself isn't the community, but that isn't for here. It simply serves as a good example.
Then, you need to provide tools for people to contribute in ways that they feel comfortable. The usual tools include email lists, discussion boards, petition signings, etc. etc. Here, I want to focus on how blogs can be used, drawing on work I am currently doing with an business membership organization.
Blogs as Framework Of Participation
In my example, I am working with a recently launched non-profit industry advocacy group/membership organization. Our goal is to build a set of knowledge about an emerging market, while simultaneously helping to define the market itself. Furthermore, we are attempting to provide a forum where users and vendors can meet and discuss their mutual goals and challenges.
With limited budget and few human resources, we decided the best thing to do was to create a framework where others could easily contribute to the knowledgebase, while providing the opportunity for influence and recognition (see list above!). We are using a variety of tools, including case study databases, speakers bureaus, eNewsletters, committees and so on. I am going to describe how we plan on using blogs (we are on the verge of launch, but haven't done so yet).
1) We are creating a blog that will be the "voice" of the association. The managing director will be the primary author, with my help.
2) We are inviting a variety of guest authors to post for a week at a time on a subject of interest to them as well as our members. Over the past few months, we have briefed more than 20 industry analysts in the US and Europe. In many cases, we will be featuring their research on our website. At the same time, timed when possible around the launch of a new report, we are inviting them to be a guest author. This is a win-win for everyone. We get the benefit of building a set of knowledge and they get good PR.
3) We are creating a blog for all vendor members, and they are welcome to post their thoughts, challenges, etc. as a channel of communication to the member base and a broader audience. (We do not allow them to market to our list of members directly).
4) We will provide a blog for any member who would like one. They can post whatever they like in it (with guidelines for libel, profanity, etc.). Again, our goal is to create a public forum where people can share their ideas.
I'll be reporting on progress on these participatory community building efforts through the use of blogs on my own blog from time to time, so please stop on by. In the meantime, if you have questions about using blogs for community building, please drop them in the comments, and I will respond.
Author: Elizabeth Albrycht | Jul 14, 04 | Permalink
| 2 comments
Category: @ Elizabeth Albrycht | Topic 3 Making PR Work